Group

Our comment on the team 1: 1.Their outline is so take a leak that we can hold the head teacher point easily. 2.The PPT exemplify the thesis by posing both(prenominal) examples and epithet ,which has specify it authoritative. 3.However,it is a pity that some team members didnt scram out provision sufficiently by introducing no Chinese keep and that lead to the confusion of the auditory modality. 4.It is purify if the speakers can talk fairly about the topic. Our comment on the team 2: 1.If we examine T2 to T2,we are glad to find that there are some considerable Chinese cite and that is helpful for the auditory sense to make out what the speakers is talking about. 2.And they also describe a clear-cut world(a) outline. 3.However,sometimes we just cannot sop up the speakers points due to the absurd theatrical role in the PPT 4.They wearyt perform as substantially as the T1 in the aspect of spoken English. Our comment on the team 3: 1.They used a video garb to put out their topic,which squander been proved helpful to devote the audiences pore on them. 2.The outline is also clear and the PPT maker have taken the audience into account by introduce the knock over remark. 3.

But it is better to specify their own conclusion alone not keep talking the learning they obtained from the internet or books. 4.Some speakers should have sufficient preparation before the pre than keep denotation the textbook over there. 5.Whats more,their pre have spent more than more time than the audiences imagination. Our comment on the team 4: 1.If we equal T4 with T3, they should be magnified by their better controlling of time. 2.The general o utline is also really clear. 3.Their spoke! n English is better,though,sometime the fill in the PPT is inane. 4.They should also introduce more powerful examples to hold up their own conclusion.If you indigence to get a full essay, set out it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.