Are minority set aside programs morally acceptable?

Are minority set aside programs morally acceptable?

Affirmative achieve programs have been set up in the best raise of minorities. While the idea is a good unmatchable the caper lies in the fact that one group of masses is be penalized for something that was done by people who for the most part atomic number 18 dead. At its heart, the contr everywheresy over affirmative activity is a controversy about justice. When we try to determine the justice of a social policy, we start with the basic premise that everyone should be do by similarly unless there is a morally relevant causality why they should be treated differently. One of the most het up atomic number 18as of affirmative action is jobs.

First of all lets use the Utilitarianism theory that suggests an action is right if it maximizes happiness for the greatest number of people over the long term, given that everyones happiness is of equal value. In otherwise words, when we make a moral choice we must(prenominal) do a cost/benefit analysis where the common denominator is pitying happiness. An action is good if it creates more happiness than unhappiness. We are concern here with everyone who might be involved. Each persons welfare must be considered, and considered equally. So, whatever benefits and burdens the society has to distribute, justice requires them to be allocated on this basis.

The question that needs to be answered is, Does affirmative action from the useful perspective cause a larger number of people to be happy? It is really hard to say, because you have one group is being made happy but at the same time another group is losing happiness. Colored groups are becoming happier because thanks to affirmative action there is exit to be a certain percentage of their group hired. only at the same time you have...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .